Incontrovertible evidence pointing to military culpability in Jonas Burgos abduction filed

RONALYN V. OLEA | Bulatlat.com
April 2, 2013

Is this the smoking gun that would force the Armed Forces of the Philippines to finally surface Jonas?

MANILA – Three days after the 43rd birthday of missing activist Jonas Burgos, his family went back to the Supreme Court in an effort to find him.

With new pieces of evidence at hand, Mrs. Edita Burgos, accompanied by her son JL and supporters from human rights group Karapatan, filed an urgent ex parte motion seeking to refer the case back to the Court of Appeals for further hearing.

Jonas’s brother, JL, said a source who has requested anonymity provided them a photograph of Jonas taken days after he was abducted and documents that would prove that an intelligence unit of the 7th Infantry Division of the Philippine Army and the 56th Infantry Battalion operating together abducted Jonas Burgos on April 28, 2007 at the Ever Gotesco Mall, Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City.

“We submit to the judicial process and offer this uncovered evidence to the courts,” Mrs. Burgos said. “We plead to the President, the Supreme Court to act on this petition.”

The photograph shows Jonas wearing a white shirt, a black handkerchief hung around his neck. His eyes look tired. Behind him is a concrete unpainted wall.

Mrs. Burgos said she and other family members were shocked the first time they saw the photograph. JL admitted he cried upon seeing it.

Documentary evidence submitted to the high court include: After Apprehension Report, Psycho Social Processing Report, Autobiography of Jonas Burgos that, according to the family, are all copies of confidential official reports on file with the Philippine Army.

Recently, the Court of Appeals Special 7th Division ruled that the military is accountable for the enforced disappearance of Jonas. The appellate court, in its decision on the writ of amparo petition and writ of habeas corpus filed by Mrs. Burgos, also held Army Maj. Harry Baliaga Jr. responsible for the crime.

In her new petition, Mrs. Burgos said the new discovered evidence can be cross checked and validated with the complete list of the officers and men of the 56th IB, 69th IB and 7th Infantry Division from June 2004 to June 2007. In a resolution dated July 5, 2011, the high court ordered the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) to produce Jonas and to submit the complete list of military personnel under the said units, together with their respective profiles, summary of information and pictures, among others, exclusively to the Supreme Court.

“The newly discovered evidence will prove that …these units captured and interrogated Jonas and based on the same evidence, could probably continue to detain him or God forbid, had disposed of him in the manner that only they could explain,” the mother of Jonas said.

The petition also seeks an order from the high court to implead the persons named in the sealed documents in the writ of amparo petition, and to issue a writ of amparo on the same persons.

The family refused to provide any details about the source of the new evidence for security reasons.

“I cannot tell any detail. Our source’s life is in danger,” JL told Bulatlat.com.

The family appealed to those involved to come out and tell the truth.

“We offer prayers for those involved that they may be enlightened and they would have the courage to say the truth,” Mrs. Burgos said.

JL called on perpetrators to “come out clean. “It’s never too late to right the wrongs,” he said.

 

Ensure punishment

In a statement, Karapatan secretary general Cristina Palabay called on President Benigno Aquino III to punish Baliaga and Brig. Gen. Eduardo Año.

Año, then colonel, was with the Intelligence Service Group of the Philippine Army at the time of the abduction of Jonas. He is among the respondents to charges of arbitrary detention and possibly murder filed by Mrs. Burgos in June 2011.

In December 2012, Aquino appointed Año as the new chief of the Intelligence Services of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (Isafp). His promotion, however, has been deferred by the Commission on Appointments of Congress due to a protest filed by the Burgos family.

Palabay warned that Baliaga should not end up like retired Gen. Jovito Palparan Jr. who remains at-large more than one year after a warrant of arrest was issued for his arrest.

Palparan and three other military personnel have been charged with serious illegal detention and kidnapping in relation to the enforced disappearance of University of the Philippines (UP) students Karen Empeño and Sherlyn Cadapan.

“The Aquino government should see through that the process ends up in the prosecution and jailing of all those responsible for the human rights violations committed against the people,” Palabay said.

In a statement, the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL), an organization of peoples’ lawyers, said Baliaga is just representative of the perpetrators.

“There are several others out there who are both accountable and responsible, ready to pounce on others. The abduction and disappearance of Jonas is undoubtedly a planned and orchestrated operation involving several personnel,” Edre Olalia, NUPL secretary general, said.

“It just cannot happen without the acquiescence, tolerance, encouragement, knowledge, orders or instruction of other personnel and higher military officials, some of whom may have been conveniently transferred while others have already been promoted,” Olalia said.

 

A slap at the AFP

The NUPL deemed that the CA decision is “highly significant because it again judicially validates what human rights defenders and several national and international rights groups have been saying all along: that enforced disappearances – and extrajudicial killings and torture — are systematically perpetrated and perpetuated by the military and State forces.

Palabay also said the CA decision is also an affirmation of the practice of state security forces to abduct and forcibly disappear persons whom they brand as ‘enemies of the state.’ Such practice, she said, is still being done under President Noynoy Aquino’s counter-insurgency program Oplan Bayanihan.

Karapatan has documented 14 victims of enforced disappearance under the Aquino administration.

Last Friday, the Burgos family celebrated Jonas’s birthday with a simple gathering. “Peachy [Jonas’s sister] cooked tuna spaghetti. We sang Happy Birthday for him,” Mrs. Burgos said.

Mrs. Burgos said Jonas’s daughter, now eight years old, recently won in a national poster-making contest with the theme, the rights of a child.

“Right now, we do not know where Jonas is,” JL said. “The measure of success is finding Jonas.”

WITH NEW EVIDENCE | Jonas Burgos family back at SC after CA rules military seized him

Mrs. Edita Burgos submitted newly-discovered evidence to the Supreme Court and expressed caution about her security and those of witnesses. (Allan Gomez/Interaksyon.com)

Mrs. Edita Burgos submitted newly-discovered evidence to the Supreme Court and expressed caution about her security and those of witnesses. (Allan Gomez/Interaksyon.com)

InterAksyon.com
April 1, 2013

MANILA, Philippines – On the heels of a Court of Appeals ruling that the 2007 abduction of Jonas Burgos was a military-sanctioned case of enforced disappearance, the family of the activist-farmer returned to the Supreme Court Monday (April 1) morning asking it to direct the CA to conduct further hearings on “newly-discovered evidence.”

Jonas’s mother Edita Burgos said in an urgent ex-parte motion, filed through lawyer Ricardo N. Ferrer Jr., that she had recently received “documentary evidence that would prove that an intelligence unit of the 7th Infantry Division of the Philippine Army and the 56th Infantry Battalion operating together captured Jonas Burgos on April 28, 2007 at the Ever Gotesco Mall, Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City.”

Such documentary evidence includes an After Apprehension Report; a Psycho Social Processing Report; and a purported Autobiography of Jonas Burgos — all part of “confidential” official reports on file with the Philippine Army.

Mrs. Burgos submitted to the SC such newly discovered evidence under seal, expressing “abundant caution” about her security and those of witnesses.

The SC filing comes four days after the Court of Appeals revealed the results of its nearly three-year inquiry, as directed by the Supreme Court, into the Burgos case, confirming it as an enforced disappearance covered by a writ of amparo, which Mrs. Burgos had sought earlier.

On Monday, in her latest motion, Mrs. Burgos recalled to the Supreme Court that in its Resolution dated July 5, 2011, it had required the submission of the complete list of the officers and men of the 56th IB, 69th IB, and 7th Infantry Division from June 2004 to June 2007. “The names in this new discovered evidence can be cross-checked and validated with the list already submitted” to the SC, Mrs. Burgos added.

Mrs. Burgos also asked the high tribunal to Court to “order the persons named in the sealed documents impleaded in CA-G.R. SP 00008-WA and G.R. No.183713, and to issue a writ of amparo on the same persons and refer back the cases to the same division of the Court of Appeals for further hearing and/or to issue such other orders in the interest of justice would be appropriate.”

In brief, added Mrs. Burgos, the “newly discovered evidence will prove that the officers and enlisted personnel of the particular unit of the 7th ID and the 56th IB are responsible for the enforced disappearance of Jonas Burgos; that these units captured and interrogated him and based on the same evidence, could probably continue to detain him or God forbid, had disposed of him in the manner that only they could explain.

EDITA BURGOS APRIL 01 STATEMENT AFTER FILING WITH SC LATEST MOTION

The Court of Appeals decision on the investigation that the SC had directed it to conduct was dated March 18, 2013 and revealed last March 27.

The dispositive portion of that decision:

• recognized “the abduction of Jonas Burgos as an enforced disappearance covered by the Rule on the Writ of Amparo”;

• declared “Maj. Harry A. Baliaga Jr. responsible for the enforced disappearance of Jonas Burgos;

• declared the “Armed Forces of the Philippines and elements of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, particularly the Philippine Army, ACCOUNTABLE for the enforced disappearance of Jonas Burgos;”

• declared the “Philippine National Police ACCOUNTABLE for the conduct of an exhaustive investigation of the enforced disappearance of Jonas Burgos,” and directed the PNP through its investigative arm, the PNP-CIDG, “to exercise extraordinary diligence to identify and locate the abductors of Jonas Burgos who are still at large and to establish the link between the abductors of Jonas Burgos and those involved in the ERAP 5 incident.”

• directed the “incumbent Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the Director General of the Philippine National Police, and their successors, to ensure the continuance of their respective investigation and coordination on the enforced disappearance of Jonas Burgos until the persons found responsible therefor are brought before the bar of justice”;

• directed the Commission on Human Rights to continue with its own independent investigation on the enforced disappearance of Jonas Burgos with the same degree of diligence required under the Rule on the Writ of Amparo; and

• directed the AFP and PNP “to extend full assistance to the Commission on Human Rights in the conduct of the latter’s investigation.”

The CA also ordered the AFP Chief of Staff and PNP Director General, and the Commission on Human Rights chairman, to submit a quarterly report to the CA on the results of their respective investigations.

Likewise, the CA noted the filing of an affidavit-complaint by Mrs. Burgos against Maj. Harry A. Baliaga Jr., et al. before the Department of Justice on June 9, 2011, and directed her to “immediately inform this Court of any development regarding the outcome of that case.”

Missing activist’s mom: Palace remarks ‘the height of insensitivity’

GIAN C. GERONIMO | GMA NEWS

October 25, 2012

Edita Burgos, the mother of still-missing activist Jonas, lashed out against the remarks of President Benigno Aquino III and Palace spokesperson Edwin Lacierda calling her family’s pleas for the return of her son “propaganda” for the leftist movement.

In a statement, Burgos said that since her son went missing, her family had become “admittedly vocal” in their plea for the military to produce her child, but the comments made by the Palace regarding their efforts were “the height of insensitivity.”

“With Malacañang’s tough branding of human rights violations as leftist propaganda, are the authorities now saying that I will never see my son again?” Burgos said.

The government has come under fire from progressive groups since Aquino and Lacierda issued statements criticizing the leftist movement.

Aquino, in a radio interview while in New Zealand, attacked the leftist movement while responding to issues of supposedly rampant human rights violations under his administration.

“So they are very good at propaganda but I think the record speaks for itself,” Aquino said.

He also mentioned a senatorial candidate fielded by the leftist community who was not performing well in surveys.

Bayan Muna Rep. Teddy Casiño, who felt alluded to by Aquino’s remarks, retorted by saying Aquino won the presidency because of his parents’ legacy.

Lacierda, meanwhile, responded to Casiño by saying Aquino’s statements were about leftist propaganda in general.

“It’s not personal. It’s the propaganda that’s the problem,” he said in a Palace press briefing on Wednesday.

He also pointed out Casiño’s low survey ratings as an indication of leftist propaganda.

“That he hasn’t [performed well in the surveys] was proof that the public do not listen to him,” he said.

Casiño, meanwhile, took to social media in responding to Lacierda, saying Lacierda and Aquino’s statements smack of insensitivity.

“My reply to Sec. Lacierda: It’s nothing personal? Don’t worry about me, I can shrug off [the] President’s insults anytime, but to dismiss [the] plight of human rights victims and their families as mere propaganda IS personal, painful & dangerous,” Casiño said on social networking site Twitter.

Meanwhile, Burgos questioned the Palace’s remarks on human rights violations and the leftist movement, and asked if it will be considered “a leftist act” for the families of victims of enforced disappearances to look for their kin.

“Now, when you are looking for a missing loved one, is it justified to label you as leftist? Unless the definition has been changed, I would not subscribe to what has been officially said by Malacañang,” Burgos said.

“To seek justice and to right a wrong done to families who have been victims of enforced disappearances, will that be considered a leftist act?”

Jonas was abducted on April 28, 2007, allegedly by military personnel, while he was having lunch at a restaurant inside the Ever Gotesco Mall in Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City.

His disappearance was during the term of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, whose administration was riddled with accusations of furthering enforced disappearances and human rights violations.

Burgos noted Aquino’s approval of the promotion of Col. Eduardo Año to the post of Brigadier General. Año is a respondent in the criminal case Burgos filed in June last year with the Department of Justice.

“Today, I fear that the message relayed in such blatant act by authorities can be a justification for human rights violators to continue their abuses,” Burgos said. — BM, GMA News